Step By Step Comparison
Here is a real-user case study who wanted a comparison of LiteSpeed Server + LSCACHE to WP Compress, so we booked a demo and tested the full setup, the step by step results are below.

Case Study Setup
To help website owners understand the real-world performance difference between LiteSpeed (with LS Cache) and WP Compress, we conducted a direct comparison using the same website across three scenarios:
-
No Optimization (Baseline)
-
LiteSpeed Server + LS Cache Plugin
-
WP Compress Active (No Other Optimizations)
Objective
To evaluate which solution delivers better performance, ease of setup, and ongoing value — without requiring complex server configurations or multiple plugins.
Testing Tools Used
Google PageSpeed Insights (Mobile Performance)

Without Any Optimization

With LiteSpeed Server + LS Cache

With WP Compress Active
Results
With WP Compress, the mobile PageSpeed score boosted to 98 points, a + 56 point improvement over the unoptimized setup, and even a + 30 point gain over the LiteSpeed server and LS Cache – without any configuration required!